Blogdrive
I've transferred to Blogdrive. This blog is now continued here.
40s, single, professional and female, living away from home.
I was surprised to find this in my Inbox. I didn't expect anything from Cliff for sometime.
Thinking of you and how you are doing. Transition back for me has been rough at first, but not as rough as I expected and got better with time. A lot of grief over losses. Was a hoot, though, if you could have seen me in the storage locker rummaging through my stored clothes and toiletries, changing my pants and shoes, repacking my suitcase, wondering if anyone would think I was nuts.My response:
I think I spent the last night I will spend in my old apartment. My wife was away when I got back. From now on I am rootless or a guest.
Seriously... How are you?
Write back. I won't be on Skype till Friday morning, your time at the earliest. How is the WH report coming? Let me know if it is too much.
Ciao,
Cliff
Dear Cliff,I wanted to say that since he knew what I knew he knew, then he was simply just waiting for someone better to come along. But I thought better of it. There's no point in putting any more pressure on the guy. Not right now.
It's good to hear from you. I dind't really know if you wanted to receive anything from me at this point.
I still have to start on the WH report but I'll have it for you by the end of the week or sooner. I don't think I'll have to add a lot to it, anyway, just titles.
I've been thinking of you, too. Wondering what you'll come home to, how you'll manage. But I suppose we all have to learn and re-learn many things over and over again in a lifetime. That doesn't make things easier, I know, but the point is, others have gone through things just as bad or even worse and survived. I suppose that makes it easier for me as I keep worrying about you. I do so want to make things easier for you.
After my class last Saturday, as I was standing on the platform waiting for the train, a wave of emotion suddenly washed over me. I was missing you badly. The feeling was so strong and so unexpected. I didn't know what had hit me or where it came from. I've never had that feeling before in my entire life.
That was scary.
And just this morning as I was in the shower, my mind went back to our last night together. You held my face in your hands as I sat on you. It felt so good, I remember now. You were so gentle yet I could feel the strength in your hands. I felt like my face was so small in your hands.
I felt secure with you at that moment, Cliff.
But you know what? I buried that emotion. I got so scared of the feeling and the realization that I buried it and ignored it. So when you said that that was the best lovemaking we've had so far, I said we've had better. I didn't get the point. I focused on the phsyical and ignored the emotional.
So I did exactly what you've been doing all your life. I walled in my feelings because I was scared of them. I didn't want to fall in love with you because I'm scared that you'll just leave me sometime in the future.
How did I develop this fear? I think it was because of all the moving I did with my family. You moved a lot, too. But the difference here is that I moved with my entire family and I enjoyed it. I enjoyed it so much that I preferred it over developing long lasting relationships with anyone outside my family. And this got replicated in my adult life. I kept hopping from one job to the next, from one career to the next. I was without fear, I told myself smugly.
In reality, though, it was because of fear. I wouldn't commit to a job and leave because mostly, I didn't like the people I was getting to know, the job was becoming too difficult and I saw no reason to invest time and effort into it, or I just got plain bored. It was so easy for me to just up and leave and so the fear was never addressed.
I am scared of getting close to someone and getting hurt.
How do you get over it?
Just like any fear, I'm thinking, you have to face it.
I don't know what that means for me. Your situation is more complicated, I know. But I don't think that you can't face anything if you close yourself from loving other people in the fear that you might hurt them. You know this. And I know that you know this. It's a chicken-and-egg question.
Just something to think about.
Anyway.
I miss you a lot.
My dearest Myles,
Dearest Myles,
I have reached the end of my journey of discovering whether to terminate my marriage. It has been a slow and deliberate process of trying many things and arriving at certainty that some things just can't be fixed and can't be persisted in as they are.Of course, there can be no denying that Cliff is interested in picking up the relationship with me where we had left off. But I don't think he was manipulating things in such a way as to make me agree to picking it up again. There are two invitations in that email: to a work relationship and to an exploration of the possibility at a personal relationship. He was not proposing; he was asking what I thought.
So, I think I can now consider helping you in your own OD pursuit. I am excited for you and glad that you have held onto this vision because I believe it is right for you. There are several developments in Manila since I saw you last, which could lead to some interesting possibilities that I should share with you.
And, I also am wondering about us. I have missed you a lot and really care for you. You might not have the interest after all that I have put you through. I have certainly caused a lot of turmoil and learned a lot about myself in the process. I think I will bring a different set of insights and dynamics to the relationship. But, what do you think?
I will be back between 4/7 (arriving at 11 pm) and 4/21. I would love to see you, catch up and fill you in on the developments I mentioned above.
Cliff
My contacting you released such a torrent of hatred from my wife that I see how much damage has been done for her for the first time in its full scope.The crux of the matter is the interpretation of the resolution of the marriage. For Cliff, the marriage had been resolved as they had decided to end it. For his wife, nothing was resolved until the divorce was final and Cliff was out of the house.
It isn't all my fault, I know. We see the world and the ethics of relationships in different ways. She feels my message to you was bad as the affair to begin with.
In the end, I have nothing to protect. Not seeing you for any type of relationship no longer matters. She is shutting off all further interaction and I am leaving the apartment we have been sharing like roommates tomorrow for good.
I will come into Manila a day later. But I will make the trip and keep my client commitments.
If you would like to see me it is ok now. I would like to see you.
Cliff
A clear and present danger. No less than the Supreme Court of the United States has so described global warming. The New York Times' editorial on the issue presents a clear reading of the decision. The following are excerpts:
It would be hard to overstate the importance of yesterday’s ruling by the Supreme Court that the federal government has the authority to regulate the carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases produced by motor vehicles.The Bush Administration has never really represented the American people; it has always been American business interests that served as impetus for its governance and policy-making.
xxx
The ruling also demolishes President Bush’s main justification for not acting — his argument that because the Clean Air Act does not specifically mention greenhouse gases, the executive branch has no authority to regulate them. The president has cited other reasons for not acting, including costs. But his narrow reading of the Clean Air Act has always been his ace in the hole.
The court offered a much more “capacious” reading of the act, as Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority. The plaintiffs — 12 states and 13 environmental groups — had argued, and the court agreed, that while the act does not specifically mention greenhouse gases, it gives the federal government clear jurisdiction over “any air pollutant” that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger “public health or welfare.”
xxx
The administration had also argued that the states did not have standing to sue on this issue because they could not show that they would be harmed by the government’s failure to regulate greenhouse gases. The court ruled that the states have a strong and legitimate interest in protecting their land and their citizens against the dangers of climate change and thus have standing to sue.
xxx
The decision was unnervingly close, and some of the arguments in the dissent, written by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., were cause for concern — especially his comments about the “complexities” of the science of climate change, which is too close for comfort to the administration’s party line.
Labels: editorial